You Lack Power To Fault Section 84 (12) Of Electoral Act 2022- Supreme Court Tells Buhari, Malami

A seven-member panel of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Musa Dattijo Mohammed, in its judgment, has unanimously held that President Muhammadu Buhari, having participated in the making of the Electoral Act 2022 by assenting to it, could not turn around to fault its provisions.

NewsBeatng reports that President Muhammadu Buhari and the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami approached the Apex court seeking to void the provision of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act 2022.

The court, which upheld the objections raised by the National Assembly and other defendants against the suit, declined to determine it on the merit but declared that the Supreme Court lacked the jurisdiction to hear it and that the suit was an abuse of court process.

Section 84(12) of the electoral act 2022 provides thus: “No political appointee at any level shall be a voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election”.

The implication of the above is that political appointees who intend to be voting delegates or stand as aspirants for elective positions in a primary election shall, first of all, resign their appointments.

For a political appointee, the failure to resign an appointment before voting as a delegate or standing as an aspirant in a primary election is a violation of the electoral act and further renders the primary election null and void and illegal.

Justice Emmanuel Agim, in the lead judgment, held that it was an attack on the democratic principle of Separation of Powers for the President to seek to direct/request the Legislature to make a particular law or alter any law.

“The President lacks the power to direct the National Assembly to amend or enact an act..it violates the principle of separation of powers.

“There is no part of the Constitution that makes the exercise of legislative powers subject to the directive of the President,” the court said.